In 2014, Maryland and CMS entered a 5-year agreement employing the All-Payer Hospital Model in the state to cut costs while improving quality. According to the year 3 performance data, Maryland has met or is on track to meet all model requirements, saving hundreds of millions of dollars as it lowers hospital readmissions and steers the state away from a volume-based system.
In 2014, Maryland teamed up with CMS to rein in hospital costs while simultaneously improving quality through a 5-year all-payer model agreement. According to a new report from the Maryland Department of Health on year 3 (2016) performance data, the model is saving hundreds of millions of dollars as it lowers hospital readmissions and steers the state away from a volume-based system.
The All-Payer Hospital Model employs a payment system that holds hospitals responsible for the total cost of care on a per-capita basis and aims to enhance the quality of healthcare delivery, improve population health, and limit the growth in healthcare spending. Under the agreement, the overall rates each hospital charges for services are regulated by the state. The requirements of the agreement include:
Based on data from 2016, Maryland has met or is on track to meet all model requirements, according to the report. The state has seen a 1.53% average growth per capita; $586 million in cumulative Medicare savings in hospital expenditures, which is 5.5% below the national average growth rate; and $461 million in cumulative Medicare savings in total cost of care, which is 2.08% below the national average growth rate.
Although the state has not yet reached the required readmission reductions, it is on track to do so, having closed the gap of Maryland’s readmissions above the nation by 79% in 2016. Aiming to reduce the rate of HACs by 30%, Maryland produced a 44% reduction in its third year, and the state has moved 100% of hospital revenues from volume-based payments to global or population-based methods.
In December 2016, Maryland submitted a Total Cost of Care Model proposal, the “Progression Plan,” to HHS and CMS. The proposal would extend the current model to include hospitals, physicians, and other outpatient providers, according to the report. The following month, while awaiting approval for its proposal, Maryland and CMS announced a 1-year extension of the All-Payer Hospital Model, with a new expiration date of December 31, 2019.
“By the end of the performance year 3, the Maryland Model is on track to meet the targets of the All-payer Model Hospital Agreement with CMS,” concludes the report. “Provider-led delivery system transformation has continued to accelerate over time. The state aims to improve beyond these results and continue to reduce costs while improving quality of care in Maryland through the completion of the current model term, and continue under a new Total Cost of Care Model.”
Despite Record ACA Enrollment, Report Reveals Underinsured Americans Are in Crisis
November 21st 2024Despite significant progress in expanding health insurance coverage since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was enacted, millions of Americans still face critical gaps in access to and affordability of health care.
Read More
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Uniting to Support Patients With Cancer Beyond Treatment
November 17th 2024Kasey Bond, MPH, of Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, speaks to why it’s vital to keep patients at the center of all strategic partnerships between academic institutions and community-based oncology practices.
Read More
Support and Skepticism Emerge as Reactions to Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s HHS Nomination
November 15th 2024In the hours after President-elect Donald J. Trump tapped Robert F. Kennedy Jr to lead HHS, reactions came swiftly to the controversial pick who would have a large influence to shake up public health.
Read More