There is little patient benefit to using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to help white blood cell growth and reduce the risk of infection in women with breast cancer, according to a study published in Journal of Clinical Oncology.
There is little patient benefit to using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to help white blood cell growth and reduce the risk of infection in women with breast cancer, according to a study published in Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends, through the Choosing Wisely campaign, that oncologists do not use G-CSF to prevent neutropenia in patients with less than a 20% risk of getting an infection. The purpose of this study was to quantify, by chemotherapy regimen, the “correlation between neutropenia-related hospitalization and G-CSF administration.” Three regimens were studied: docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC); docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH); and doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.
“In women with breast cancer treated with a conventional dose of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, a chemotherapy regimen that has low risk of infection, more than half of them were also treated with G-CSF, with no benefit,” Abiy Agiro, lead author and research manager for HealthCore, said in a statement. “This is unfortunate, especially given that patients can experience uncomfortable side effects from G-CSF, such as bone pain, headache, and nausea. When the chemotherapy risk for neutropenia is low, these high-cost agents place an unnecessary burden on the healthcare system without providing a discernable benefit to the patient.”
The analysis included patients with breast cancer who began first-cycle chemotherapy from 2008 to 2013. Overall, 4815 patients received TC; 2292 received TCH; and 1638 patients received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.
Overall, the G-CSF therapy was associated with some reductions in neutropenia-related hospitalizations in the TC and TCH treatment groups. Meanwhile, patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with G-CSF actually had a slightly higher rate of neutropenia compared with patients not taking any G-CSF. However, the difference was not statistically significant.
The researchers also determined that, despite guidelines regarding appropriate use of G-CSF, it is still commonly used in regimens that do not have a high risk for inducing neutropenia-related complications.
“This study confirms previous trials that have shown that G-CSF is effective at decreasing fever and infections with higher-risk chemotherapy treatments but failed to show any benefit with lower-risk regimens,” said Gary Lyman, MD, MPH, co-director of the Hutchinson Institute of Cancer Outcomes Research for the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. “The study also showed that older age was associated with increased risk of neutropenia-related hospitalization, however the healthcare community needs to study G-CSF further to better understand which patients on which chemotherapies can benefit most.”
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Texas Oncology to Roll Out Canopy for ePROs After Head-to-Head Pilot
March 18th 2025Debra Patt, MD, PhD, MBA, executive vice president of Public Policy and Strategy for Texas Oncology, said the practice received positive feedback from nurses and patients during a pilot that concluded in February.
Read More
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen