Mikael Eriksson, PhD, epidemiologist at Karolinska Institute in Sweden, discusses the development and implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) model to reduce bias and improve breast cancer prevention.
Mikael Eriksson, PhD, epidemiologist at Karolinska Institute in Sweden, explains how to reduce bias within artificial intelligence (AI) models using large data sets that can help prevent breast cancer. He outlined the development process and clinical pathway for the AI model.
Eriksson presented a long-term image-derived AI risk model for primary prevention of breast cancer at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2024 between December 10 to December 13.
This transcript has been lightly edited for clarity.
Transcript
What steps were taken to mitigate potential biases in the AI model, such as algorithmic bias or data bias?
The biggest problem with the AI models is that they can learn very well but they can also start to learn the specific type of image data that are using it. The images, for instance, that are particular to that brand, the AI can start to learn that pattern so we need to have a big mix of data from different vendors, different screening routines, different caregivers, different countries, and different ethnicities.
When we have this very rich data set, then we can lower the bias of the AI learning specific features for one specific setting and it really captures the causal relationship between the image features and the outcome of breast cancer.
How do you envision the integration of this AI model into routine clinical practice?
Yeah, so we have a typical phase. We start by developing the model and that is done in retrospective data and as we are epidemiologists, we are very keen on having large data sets and that coincides very well with AI because it really needs large data sets. Then we go into the prospective setting where we test the data for completely new scenarios that the AI has not been seen before.
Then we come into the clinical trials where we really, in the best possible way, can randomize women into different arms and then test the AI model in the best possible ways. After that comes the potential clinical approval of the model.
Tailored Dosing for MM Matters More Than Drug Count: Ajai Chari, MD
April 25th 2025When it comes to treating multiple myeloma (MM), Ajai Chari, MD, argued that more is not always better. More intense treatment regimens, or those with more drugs, don't necessarily guarantee better outcomes.
Read More
Inside the Center's MDD Value Model and Its Use of Dynamic Pricing
May 13th 2025Larragem Raines, MS, of the Center for Innovation & Value Research, discusses the organization's major depressive disorder (MDD) open-source value model, dynamic pricing, and the future role of artificial intelligence in care.
Listen
Empowering Teams Begins With Human Connection: Missy Hopson, PhD
April 16th 2025Missy Hopson, PhD, Ochsner Health, discussed in detail the challenges of strengthening the patient-centered workforce, the power of community reputation for encouraging health care careers, and the influence of empowered workforces on patient outcomes.
Read More
What the Updated Telephone Consumer Protection Act Rules Mean for Health Care Messaging
April 4th 2025As new Federal Communications Commission rules take effect April 11, 2025, mPulse CEO Bob Farrell explains how health organizations can stay compliant while building patient trust through transparency and personalized engagement.
Read More