Identifying which treatments for multiple sclerosis have the most promise is challenging because there are no head-to-head studies comparing treatments and what's promising for one clinician is different than what's promising for another clinician, explained June Halper, MSN, APN-C, MSCN, FAAN, chief executive officer, Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers.
Identifying which treatments for multiple sclerosis have the most promise is challenging because there are no head-to-head studies comparing treatments and what's promising for one clinician is different than what's promising for another clinician, explained June Halper, MSN, APN-C, MSCN, FAAN, chief executive officer, Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers.
Transcript
Within the last year or so, what treatments have been demonstrating the greatest promise in managing multiple sclerosis?
It’s a hard question to answer in terms of what has shown the greatest promise. If you ask patients, they would probably answer marijuana because pot is becoming legalized in a number of states, and in many instances, patients consider that a treatment. When we talk about disease-modifying therapy, there really are no head-to-head studies where you would say Betaseron or Avonex or better than Gilenya. So, we really don’t know which is the most promising.
What’s the most promising for one clinician is different for another clinicians. I guess we have to wait to see if, one, there will be a comparable study. I doubt it. But more and more, we’re going to see things like roundtables like you do here in your organization to try and get some expert opinion, to listen to the key opinion leaders who can say, “In my experience, "X" medication works better than "Y" medication on patients that have had MS [multiple sclerosis] for less than 5 years and have the following picture.” I think that’s the thing we have to rely on most, at least for now, is the expert opinion and the widespread experience that clinicians have with the various drugs.
The other problem we face is the insurance companies, they might not have particular drugs in their formularies, so certain clinicians may not be able to analyze their outcome or their benefit because their patients might not be entitled to get them. In this country, we have a wide variety of challenges. In Canada for example, it’s a nationalized health system, so they have access to all the drugs.
So, that question’s a tough question that I’m hoping will be answered, mainly by expert opinion and long-standing experience, over the next few years.
New Insights Into Meth-Associated PAH Care Gaps: Anjali Vaidya, MD, on Closing the Divide
June 4th 2025Research from Anjali Vaidya, MD, FACC, FASE, FACP, Temple University Hospital, reveals critical care gaps for patients with methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and integrated support.
Read More
Laundromats as a New Frontier in Community Health, Medicaid Outreach
May 29th 2025Lindsey Leininger, PhD, and Allister Chang, MPA, highlight the potential of laundromats as accessible, community-based settings to support Medicaid outreach, foster trust, and connect families with essential health and social services.
Listen
Tailored Dosing for MM Matters More Than Drug Count: Ajai Chari, MD
April 25th 2025When it comes to treating multiple myeloma (MM), Ajai Chari, MD, argued that more is not always better. More intense treatment regimens, or those with more drugs, don't necessarily guarantee better outcomes.
Read More
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More