An analysis of data available on HealthCare.gov and 12 state-based exchanges while consumers shopped for plans found that sites should take more steps to better support consumers in making informed health plan decisions.
After analyzing the use of HealthCare.gov and 12 state-based exchanges during the first and second open enrollment periods and the data available to consumers before creating an account and after creating an account, researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania recommend taking more steps to better support consumers in making informed health plan decisions, according to a letter published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
The researchers found that while decision tools most likely to be helpful to consumers were more common in the second versus the first period, they still were not universally available.
“Performance of the health insurance marketplaces will significantly depend on such features as the order in which plans are displayed, the plan features listed, and the availability of decision-support tools created for consumers," the study’s lead author Charlene A. Wong, MD, a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar and fellow in Penn's Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, said in a statement. "While we generally found improvement in the second versus the first open enrollment period, additional measures can and should be added in the future to further improve the selection process for consumers.”
Only 3 states had out-of-pocket cost estimators that added together their premium and expected costs based on consumers’ predicted use while most sites only allowed consumers to sort or filter plans by premium and deductible amounts.
Most states using the premium amount as their default plan order, which may cause consumers’ to be overly influenced by the premium amount while not paying enough attention to other potential out-of-pocket expenses, such as meeting a high deductible, the researchers surmised.
One improvement over the first open enrollment period was that 4 sites had health plan quality rankings in the second open enrollment period compared with just 2 the first year.
“By including more of these tools in both real and ‘window’ shopping stages, marketplaces can help de-mystify what for many is a complex, opaque process,” Dr Wong said.
Health Care Utilization and Cost of Diagnostic Testing for Respiratory Infections
September 17th 2025Syndromic reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction tests for respiratory infections were associated with lower health care resource utilization and costs, implicating potential for improved value in patient care.
Read More
AI in Health Care: Balancing Governance, Innovation, and Trust
September 2nd 2025In this conversation with Reuben Daniel, associate vice president of artificial intelligence at UPMC Health Plan, we dive into how UPMC Health Plan builds trust with providers and members, discuss challenges of scaling AI effectively, and hear about concrete examples of AI's positive impact.
Listen
Infertility Coverage Boosts ART Use and Pregnancy Success: Richard A. Brook, MS, MBA
August 26th 2025In this episode, Richard A. Brook, MS, MBA, discusses his study showing that infertility treatment coverage increases assisted reproductive technology (ART) use and improves pregnancy outcomes.
Listen