The combination of smoking and socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with risk of asthma among different socio-occupational groups, this new study found.
In addition to independent risk factors, the interaction between smoking and socioeconomic status (SES) was found to be associated with risk of respiratory illnesses, such as asthma, according to a new study.
“This study found putative interactions between smoking and different measures of SES in relation to the probability of having respiratory diseases,” wrote the study researchers. “Education and occupational classification, as different measures of SES, presented different patterns of smoking association with asthma, when the latter is divided by allergic status.”
The results of this population-based analysis were published in Respiratory Medicine.
The researchers used data from the West Sweden Asthma Study (WSAS), which included 23,753 participants, and the Obstructive Lung Disease in Northern (OLIN) studies, which included 6519 participants. All participants included in the analysis were randomly selected adults aged 20 to 75 years living in Sweden in 2016.
All participants received a questionnaire that consisted of 3 parts, with questions pertaining to the following:
In total, the finaly analysis sample included 30,123 participants:
As a result, the study found education and occupation presented different smoking associations between allergic and nonallergic asthma status.
Respiratory problems associated with smoking and allergic asthma was more profound among manual workers in service and intermediate nonmanual employees than in high professional and executive workers. However, the prevalence of allergic asthma was higher among highly educated groups compared with lower-educated groups.
In contrast, adverse smoking effects and nonallergic asthma were more prevalent among high occupational workers compared with manual and home workers. However, nonallergic asthma status was more prevalent among low0-educated groups compared with highly educated groups.
The results of this study suggest that certain high-risk social and occupational groups may benefit from individualized smoking cessation interventions more than others. In addition, the researchers believe that more research is needed to fully understand the mechanism behind the interaction of smoking and occupation exposures to reduce the risk of asthma among different SES and occupational settings.
“In conclusion, this study showed that beyond the independent role of smoking and SES in respiratory diseases, in high-income countries such as Sweden, SES as measured using different socioeconomic classification systems and smoking interact in defining the risk of respiratory diseases in adults,” wrote the researchers. “Better understanding of this interaction can be of help when identifying social and occupational risk groups at higher need of preventive intervention.”
Reference
Bashir MB, Basna R, Hedman L, et al. Interaction of smoking and social status on the risk of respiratory outcomes in a Swedish adult population: a nordic epilung study. Respiratory Medicine. Published online March 9, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107192
Building Trust, Breaking Barriers: Health Care Leaders Tackle Primary Care Challenges
August 8th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the chief medical officers of CVS Health and Aetna, as well as CVS Health's chief health equity officer, about primary and preventive care engagement, the impact of telehealth, and the role of trust in patient-provider relationships.
Listen
Frameworks for Advancing Health Equity: LGBTQIA+ Affirming Provider Designation
July 9th 2024Kim Zynn, vice president of UPMC Health Plan's provider network and development relations team, shares how physicians can become LGBTQIA+ affirming providers, which is designated within the health plan.
Listen
Infant Mortality Increases Across US Following Dobbs Decision
October 25th 2024The Dobbs decision was associated with a 7% absolute increase in overall infant mortality—equivalent to 247 excess deaths—and a 10% increase among infants with congenital anomalies, corresponding to 204 additional deaths.
Read More