According to a recent survey, hospitalists said that the 2-midnight rule is negatively impacting patient care as well as patient finances.
According to a recent survey, hospitalists said that the 2-midnight rule is negatively impacting patient care as well as patient finances.
The rule, which was enacted by CMS, only reimburses providers at Medicare inpatient rates when patients are admitted to a hospital for at least 2 overnight stays. Patients that are not admitted are billed as outpatients or under observation status. These stipulations were implemented to ensure that providers were only admitting patients who truly required inpatient stays.
But hospitalists claim that the rule is disrupting their workflows and clinical decision-making processes. It has also negatively impacted many provider-patient relationships. The Society of Hospital Medicine Public Policy Committee, which conducted the study, reported that:
“It is clear that the current use of observation status is not a sustainable policy. Providers, hospitals and their patients are feeling unnecessary pressures from observation policy and, in many cases, patient care is being undermined. Hospitalists resoundingly agree that the policy requires significant changes focused on solving the myriad problems underlying the current system.”
Hospitalists have proposed both short-term and long-term solutions to improve decision-making during the inpatient admission process. In the short term they suggest focusing on provider and patient education. They also recommend reforming the Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor program to ensure that providers aren’t being pressured into making certain decisions. In the long term, they suggest that observation status be eliminated and replaced with an alternative system that can manage patients who require shorter inpatient stays.
“Observation status policy directly and unnecessarily stresses the physician-patient relationship. Indeed, it is not uncommon for patient frustrations with the policy and its shortcomings to be directed at the hospitalist, case managers and the hospital,” read the report. “In effect, observation status is undermining the trust that patients have in their doctors and hospitals to provide them with the best care possible.”
Around the Web
The Observation Status Problem: Impact and Recommendations for Change [SHM]
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More
New Research Challenges Assumptions About Hospital-Physician Integration, Medicare Patient Mix
April 22nd 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Brady Post, PhD, lead author of a study published in the April 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care®, challenges the claim that hospital-employed physicians serve a more complex patient mix.
Listen
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen
Comparing Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Between Fee-for-Service and Medicare Advantage
April 4th 2025This study examined postdiagnosis breast cancer treatment outcomes for Medicare Advantage vs fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare in Ohio and found no significant differences overall but disparities for Black patients with FFS Medicare.
Read More