Experts also explained how hormone therapy can benefit women managing chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension on top of their menopause.
Hot flashes, night sweats, and other vasomotor symptoms (VMS) that come with menopause remain among the most disruptive symptoms of midlife for many women. Although hormone therapy has long been the most effective treatment, lingering concerns about cardiovascular, cancer, and clotting risks have left many patients untreated. Recent evidence emphasizes that timing, dose, and formulation determine whether hormone therapy is safe and beneficial—not just age.
At The Menopause Society 2025 Annual Meeting, Stephanie S. Faubion, MD, MBA, FACP, MSCP, IF, medical director of The Menopause Society and director of the Mayo Clinic Center for Women’s Health, outlined a clear message: hormone therapy remains the most effective treatment for VMS, but using it requires mindful patient selection and shared decision-making.
Vasomotor symptoms, commonly known as hot flashes and night sweats, affect up to 80% of women during the menopausal transition.2 These symptoms arise from declining estrogen levels that disrupt thermoregulation, leading to episodic heat surges, sweating, and sleep disturbances. Untreated, they can persist for years and significantly impair quality of life, mood, and cognitive function.
Hormone therapy, which replaces estrogen with or without progesterone, is considered the gold standard for treating VMS in most women.1 “Hormone therapy is the first-line therapy and the most effective therapy for vasomotor symptoms,” Faubion emphasized.
Hormone therapy requires mindful patient selection and shared decision-making. | Image credit: Vitalii Vodolazskyi – stock.adobe.com
FDA-approved indications for hormone therapy include moderate to severe VMS, prevention of osteoporosis, and management of premature menopause or early estrogen deficiency. Indirect benefits may include improvements in mood, sleep, and sexual function.
However, Faubion cautioned that not all patients are candidates for systemic estrogen use. Contraindications include unexplained vaginal bleeding, a history of estrogen-sensitive cancers such as breast or endometrial cancer, prior stroke or myocardial infarction, inherited or acquired high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and severe liver disease.
The “timing hypothesis” suggests that the safety and benefits of hormone therapy depend largely on when treatment begins relative to menopause onset. Faubion explained that women who start therapy before age 60 or within 10 years of their final menstrual period tend to experience the greatest symptom relief and cardiovascular protection, with minimal risk of adverse events. On the other hand, initiating therapy later, when atherosclerosis and vascular aging are more advanced, may minimize the treatment’s benefits. The primary benefits of estrogen and hormone therapy appear to be between ages 35 and 55 years—the typical perimenopause period.3
According to Faubion, ideal candidates for hormone therapy are women younger than 60 years or who had their last menstrual period within 10 years who have bothersome symptoms such as hot flashes, mood instability, or sleep disturbances.1 Other favorable considerations include low cardiovascular and breast cancer risk and no contraindications with treatments. Concerns around bone density and patient preferences also play important roles.
So, why not use custom compounded hormones? According to Faubion, there is a lack of safety and efficacy data with this practice and too much batch-to-batch variability, and these don’t come with package inserts, which can confuse patients.
“If you’re giving them all the same doses and giving them the same levels, it’s the antithesis of individualized therapy,” she added.
Instead, she said the focus should be on individualizing therapy through evidence-based formulations. Transdermal administration may offer additional safety advantages over oral formulations, showing less of an impact on clotting factors, blood pressure, triglycerides, and inflammatory markers.
Despite her description of the “ideal candidate” for initiating hormone therapy, Faubion noted there is no “magic age” for discontinuation. Long-term use may be appropriate for healthy women with ongoing symptoms or elevated risk of fracture; duration should depend on symptoms, health status, and personal preference Faubion said.
When the uterus is still present after menopause, progestogen must be included to prevent endometrial cancer, while low-dose vaginal estrogen for genitourinary symptoms can be continued indefinitely. Ultimately, Faubion urged clinicians to move beyond one-size-fits-all thinking.
Most women approaching menopause have at least 1 chronic condition.4 Among women aged 55 and older, 4 in 5 of them live with at least 1 chronic condition, with half managing 2 or more and 20% managing 3 or more. These conditions include:
References
Combination Therapy Proves More Effective in NSCLC Compared With Chemotherapy
October 22nd 2025Meta-analyses presented at the CHEST 2025 Annual Meeting find that combinations that include amivantamab and nivolumab improved overall and progression-free survival in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Read More
AI in Health Care: Balancing Governance, Innovation, and Trust
September 2nd 2025In this conversation with Reuben Daniel, associate vice president of artificial intelligence at UPMC Health Plan, we dive into how UPMC Health Plan builds trust with providers and members, discuss challenges of scaling AI effectively, and hear about concrete examples of AI's positive impact.
Listen
Infertility Coverage Boosts ART Use and Pregnancy Success: Richard A. Brook, MS, MBA
August 26th 2025In this episode, Richard A. Brook, MS, MBA, discusses his study showing that infertility treatment coverage increases assisted reproductive technology (ART) use and improves pregnancy outcomes.
Listen