Even though there is a 1-year gap between the Oncology Care Model and the Enhancing Oncology Model, there remain value-based oncology payment programs with private payers, said Glenn Balasky, executive director of Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers.
Even though there is a 1-year gap between the Oncology Care Model (OCM) and the Enhancing Oncology Model (EOM), there remain value-based oncology payment programs with private payers, said Glenn Balasky, executive director of Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers.
Transcript
How is Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers handling the 1-year delay between the end of the Oncology Care Model and the beginning of the Enhancing Oncology Model?
With the pause of the OCM program, we’re actually blessed as a practice at Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers to have a lot of ongoing programs with our private payers. Our navigators, social workers, data coordinators, we’re kind of redirecting/redeploying them to the private payer efforts that we have.
We also have got to continue some efforts. We’re doing HCC [Hierarchical Condition Category] coding, some other tracking of the Medicare patients. We’re probably going to keep that at a certain level of rhythm, even though we haven’t made a final determination on the EOM. It’s to prepare so that we don’t have to ramp quickly back up into the EOM, but ease into it when it does come about.
Are there any changes from OCM to EOM that you think will be the most challenging shift?
I think we’re well prepared to move into the EOM. It’s a less of a subset of patients that we have to deal with. It might mean some different levels of effort and some targeting. And then there are new things with the EOM that’s part of our job too, right now—it’s just be a student, to study and learn and figure out as the details of the EOM get revealed, there’s not only principles but how will those principles execute. That’s something that we have to kind of keep our eyes and ears open for.
Sequencing CAR T and Bispecifics for Multiple Myeloma: Tyler Sandahl, PharmD
July 8th 2025Tyler Sandahl, PharmD, a clinical pharmacist at Mayo Clinic, explains that sequencing novel multiple myeloma therapies with CAR T-cell therapy is generally prioritized first for eligible patients, while bispecific antibodies are reserved for later lines or for patients unable to tolerate CAR T.
Read More
Driving Value via Outcomes-Based Pricing and EHR Interoperability: Tyler Sandahl, PharmD
July 7th 2025Tyler Sandahl, PharmD, a clinical pharmacist at Mayo Clinic, discussed the complexities of alternative payment models for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell and bispecific therapies and the need for improved data sharing in cancer care.
Read More
At ASCO, Testing and AI Rival Drugs for Attention, but Reimbursement Remains a Barrier
July 5th 2025Precision oncology has entered a new phase, as data sets mature and a new wave of tools emerges to help clinicians manage cancer care over time. A feature from our upcoming special issue of Evidence-Based Oncology: our annual ASCO recap.
Read More