A study by the Government Accountability Office finds differences in diagnostic coding between Medicare Advantage plans and traditional Medicare fee-for-service coverage.
These differences mean that Medicare Advantage beneficiary risk scores in 2010 were 4.8 percent to 7.1 percent higher than if those beneficiaries were continuously enrolled in fee-for-service, according to GAO, a congressional investigatory agency. And the higher scores translated in 2010 to $3.9 billion to $5.8 billion in higher payments to Medicare Advantage plans. Further, the coding differences increase over time, suggesting higher financial impacts in 2011 and 2012.
CMS estimates a lower level, 3.4 percent, of higher beneficiary risk scores in Medicare Advantage plans, translating to $2.7 billion in excess payments. GAO contends the CMS methodology does not include more current data, trending coding differences over time, or accounting for such characteristics as sex, health status, Medicaid enrollment status, beneficiary residential location, and disability.
Read more at:http://tinyurl.com/6t65zft
Source: Health Data Management
Health Equity & Access Weekly Roundup: January 11, 2025
January 11th 2025ACA enrollment rate hits a milestone, though IRA subsidies may not extend beyond 2025; network adequacy standards fail to translate into efficient access to mental health care for Medicaid enrollees; research examines racial disparities in postpartum hypertension and vaccine uptake.
Read More
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen