Valerie M. Harvey, MD, MPH, FAAD, founder of the Hampton Roads Center for Dermatology, highlighted the long-standing underrepresentation of minority populations in dermatology clinical trials at the Skin of Color Update 2024 in New York City on Friday.
Valerie M. Harvey, MD, MPH, FAAD, founder and director of the Hampton Roads Center for Dermatology, opened the Skin of Color Update 2024 in New York City on Friday with a presentation on the underrepresentation of minority populations in dermatology clinical trials, a widespread issue across multiple disease states.
She began by reporting that there has been little progress made in the last 3 decades to increase the participation of racial and ethnic minority groups in clinical trials. Harvey noted that clinical trial representation is important because it contributes to a more comprehensive data set, restores the trust of potential participants in those conducting studies, and expands access to safe, effective interventions.
More specifically, she mentioned that a recent review determined that 59.8% of 97 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted exclusively in the US reported data on the racial or ethnic backgrounds of participants.1 Of the 13,681 participants in these trials, 74.4% were White.
Also, Harvey noted that the review demonstrated how representation varies by disease. For example, only 30% of US-based psoriasis studies had more than 20% racially or ethnically diverse research participants compared with 73.9% and 91.7% of acne and atopic dermatitis RCTs, respectively.
Consequently, Harvey listed various efforts by the Skin of Color Society (SOCS) to increase diverse clinical trial enrollment. This included the Diversity in Dermatology Clinical Trials Task Force, which hosted several meetings to discuss relevant action items, like establishing more diversity among clinical trial staff and setting clear definitions of race population descriptors.
Another effort Harvey highlighted was the Diversity Clinical Research Mentoring Program, which was codeveloped by the SOCS and the dermatology section of the National Medical Association. The program consists of 3 phases: foundations and principles of clinical trials course, in-person mentor training, and 18 months of intensive training. She noted the program's goals are to help train the next generation of principal investigators.
Harvey concluded by listing ways those in different health care industry sectors can help increase clinical trial diversity.
“Industry, make sure that you partner with communities from the beginning during the design part of the studies, selecting sites in diverse communities, ensuring that your investigators are diverse, and making sure that everything that you do is inclusive,” she said.“Clinicians, what we can do is just get involved. Be knowledgeable about clinical trials, educate your patients, and build trust.”
Dermatology is not the only area struggling with clinical trial diversity. Another disease state where this issue persists is prostate cancer. Deaths from prostate cancer among Black men represent the greatest mortality disparity in oncology as they are 2 to 4 times more likely to die from prostate cancer than men of any other group.2
However, a meta-analysis found that 58.5% of 65 US prostate cancer trials that reported patients’ race reported the participation of Black patients.3 Therefore, Black patients with prostate cancer are significantly underrepresented in US trials compared with their share of prostate cancer incidence; they are especially underrepresented in larger trials.
To help combat this issue, the American Cancer Society (ACS) recently announced a collaboration with Trial Library and the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium to accelerate the recruitment of Black men with prostate cancer in clinical trials.2 ACS said it would provide eligible practice-based applicants with up to $200,000 in direct costs per year for 2 years to help build the infrastructure needed to increase clinical trial enrollment.
Clinical trial diversity is also an issue within the diabetes space. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recently reported that Black and Hispanic patients are more than 50% more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes than non-Hispanic White patients in the US.4 Similarly, Black patients with diabetes experience amputation at a rate twice as high as nonminorities, and they are 2.3 times more likely to die from diabetes than White patients.
Despite this, the FDA’s 2015 to 2017 Drug Trials Snapshot Summary Reports showed that minorities were grossly underrepresented in diabetes-related clinical trials.5 More specifically, 75% of clinical trial participants identified as White, 23% as Asian, 17% as Hispanic, and 5% as Black.
In response, Janet Brown-Friday, RN, MSN, MPH, ADA president of health care and education, called for action during her address at the ADA’s 83rd Scientific Sessions last year.6 She noted that health inequities remain widespread, contributing to worse outcomes and higher diabetes risks among the most underserved communities.
Brown-Friday listed barriers to clinical trial diversity, including mistrust and a lack of access. Changes she suggested to increase diversity included minimizing participant costs and implementing a diverse clinical staff.
"Participating in a clinical trial should not be a financial burden," Brown-Friday said. "Use study resources to minimize costs for participants. If transportation to the study site is an issue, pay for it."
These examples are only a glimpse of the broader impact the lack of diverse clinical trials has on the health care industry. Overall, 75% of the 32,000 participants in the trials of 53 novel drugs approved by the FDA in 2020 were White despite racial and ethnic minorities making up 40% of the US population.
Consequently, Harvey mentioned during her presentation that the FDA recently announced it is developing a diversity action plan (DAP) to ensure more women and people of color are enrolled in clinical trials.7 Under the DAP, those performing large phase 3 trials must provide the FDA with their plans to enroll patients representative of those using the respective product.
Lastly, she suggested engaging with targeted communities early on to help shape the trial based on their concerns.
“When we’re designing these studies, when we’re asking these research questions, it’s really important to engage the community from the outset to really get a sense of what their priorities are, what their concerns are, so that we can build that into the study design,” Harvey said. “I think that is so important to get meaningful diversity and so that we can really translate what we learn from these clinical trials into practice.”
References
Despite Record ACA Enrollment, Report Reveals Underinsured Americans are in Crisis
November 21st 2024Despite significant progress in expanding health insurance coverage since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was enacted, millions of Americans still face critical gaps in access and affordability to health care.
Read More
New Study Finds Risk Groups, Outpatient Care Barriers in Chronic Liver Disease
November 20th 2024Patients with chronic liver disease who were unable to establish care were 85% more likely to require recurrent hospitalizations. This group included a disproportionate number of women and individuals with physical limitations affecting their health.
Read More
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
OS Better With Belantamab Mafodotin Triplet vs Daratumumab in R/R MM
November 19th 2024The key secondary end point of overall survival (OS) was met in the DREAMM-7 trial of belantamab mafodotin (Blenrep; GSK) for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM).
Read More