As the discussion about disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) continues, the panelists discuss the long-term results of therapy and the effects of disease-modifying therapies on the natural history of MS.
Patricia K. Coyle, MD, concludes that it is too early to truly analyze how the emergence of disease-modifying therapies has affected the long-term costs due to a lack of data. Dr Coyle explains that MS is a long-term disease, and the average time from a relapsing to a progressive/secondary progressive phase is roughly 20 years. She states that the first disease-modifying therapy was only developed 20 years ago, so there is not much data to provide the results on how disease-modifying therapies have altered the natural history of MS.
Although Dr Coyle does not believe there is enough evidence available, she feels that disease-modifying therapies are improving MS outcomes.
Leslie Fish, PharmD, agrees with Dr Coyle and explains that although there are trial inconsistencies that currently make it difficult to assess the outcomes of disease-modifying therapies, overall the studies conducted have proven that these therapies decrease the number of exacerbations and result in less patient disability during early stages of MS.
Dr Fish concludes by stating that although disease-modifying therapy is effective in early stages, and is moving the natural history of MS toward the right direction, the treatment options lag behind for progressive phases of the disease.
Impact of Hospital-Physician Integration on Medicare Patient Mix
April 11th 2025This study found no evidence that hospital employment of physicians resulted in physicians treating sicker patients, undercutting claims that hospital-employed physicians serve a higher-acuity patient mix.
Read More
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen
NCCN Data Find Racial, Socioeconomic Disparities in Quality of Care for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
April 9th 2025New data from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) reveal that socially vulnerable and minority patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are less likely to receive recommended treatments and achieve longer survival.
Read More