As the panelists discuss the skepticism often associated with treatment outcomes of immunotherapy when compared with outcomes of standard treatment options such as chemotherapy, the panelists conclude that tumor response (or reduction) should not be considered an ultimate end point when determining results.
In practice, Daniel J. George, MD, believes that patients’ goals are achieved when they can experience a decent quality of life without experiencing any disease progression. Dr George further explains that some patients that have tumor burden still experience a fantastic quality of life if their treatment side effects are managed correctly.
Jeffrey Weber, MD, PhD, agrees with Dr George and explains that although tumor response is a desirable end point, as recognized by the FDA, it should be perceived as a useful, but not ultimate, result factor.
Impact of Hospital-Physician Integration on Medicare Patient Mix
April 11th 2025This study found no evidence that hospital employment of physicians resulted in physicians treating sicker patients, undercutting claims that hospital-employed physicians serve a higher-acuity patient mix.
Read More
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen
NCCN Data Find Racial, Socioeconomic Disparities in Quality of Care for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
April 9th 2025New data from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) reveal that socially vulnerable and minority patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are less likely to receive recommended treatments and achieve longer survival.
Read More