While the results of evolutionRMS, comparing evobrutinib with teriflunomide, were negative, that "doesn't mean that evobrutinib is not working," said Xavier Montalban, MD, PhD, director of the Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia (Cemcat).
Xavier Montalban, MD, PhD, director of the Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia (Cemcat), discussed the designs and findings of the phase 3 evolutionRMS (relapsing multiple sclerosis) 1 and 2 trials, which he presented during the "Late-Breaking Research & Clinical Trials" session at Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) Forum 2024 on March 2.
Also, although the study population consisted of patients from 52 different countries, Montalban explained that there were no variations in treatment responses.
Transcript
Can you explain the design of the phase 3 evolutionRMS 1 and 2 trials?
They are 2 identical phase 3 trials that were blind. We used them to compare teriflunomide against evobrutinib. More than 1200 patients were recruited in each of the trials. It was a large, large trial, and the duration was about 156 weeks.
Could you please summarize the findings of these trials?
The trial was essentially negative. Evobrutinib didn't show any positive results in relation to teriflunomide for annualized relapse rate, which was the primary end point, or any of the secondary end points, such as confirmed disability progression, confirmed disability improvement, or MRI [magnetic resonance imaging] parameters.
This doesn't mean that evobrutinib is not working. It does work as well as teriflunomide, but we have to say that the trial is definitely negative.
Considering the study population consisted of patients across 52 countries, were there variations in treatment responses or safety outcomes based on geographic regions or demographic factors?
Remember that we had 2 big events during the trial. One was the pandemic and the other was the Ukraine-Russia conflict. In the end, quite a large proportion of patients came from eastern Europe, especially from Ukraine and Russia, but the Merck team managed the situation very well. When you compare patients coming from those areas to patients coming from other areas in the world, there are no differences at all. I think there is no influence at all on the final result of the trials.
IgE Mediation in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis, Concurrent Immune Disorders: Amy Paller, MD
August 4th 2025Amy Paller, MD, pediatric dermatologist and clinical researcher at Northwestern Medicine's Feinberg School of Medicine, discussed the potential impact of reducing immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis.
Read More
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Reduce Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes, Improve Survival
August 2nd 2025Studies found that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists were valuable tools in improving outcomes and survival in those with coronary plaque and after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Read More