Whitney Goldsberry, MD, fellow at the University of Alabama's Division of Gynecologic Oncology, discusses findings from her and colleagues' recent analysis of cost-sharing trends for PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer treatment.
Whitney Goldsberry, MD, a fellow at the University of Alabama's Division of Gynecologic Oncology in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, discusses findings from her and colleagues' recent analysis of cost-sharing trends for PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer treatment.
Transcript
Payers had the highest cost in your analysis, but nearly half of the patients in the study utilized financial assistance programs to gain access to PARP inhibitors. What does this say in terms of co-pays being a potential financial barrier to these therapies?
Fortunately, we found that patient out-of-pocket costs were actually generally low. About 75% of patients paid less than $5 a month for their prescriptions. And there were outliers—there was one patient in our study who paid over $3,000 for just a one-month supply. Therefore, in the ability of patients to access [these drugs], co-pays could be a potential financial barrier. To aid in that, we utilize specialty pharmacists who actually assist in obtaining financial assistance for patients, which could include things like co-pay assistance, or sometimes even a free drug from different manufacturers.
PARP inhibitors have seen several new indications since they were first approved for ovarian cancer treatment in 2014. What trends did you see in cost over time?
Although our study was limited by a small number, we didn't note a few general patterns. The overall monthly cost of PARP inhibitors appeared to actually decrease from 2017 to 2019. Similarly, the monthly costs covered by payers appeared to decrease slightly, reflecting a decrease in the overall cost. Through this, thankfully, the out-of-pocket cost actually remained very low. We did notice that the contribution of financial assistance programs did increase over time, which may reflect improved utilization of existing financial assistance programs. These trends will be very important as we move forward in the broader applications of these drugs.
Physician Gaps in Genetic Testing Knowledge May Impact Ovarian Cancer Care
February 5th 2025While genetic testing rates for advanced ovarian cancer have increased, gaps in physician understanding and confidence in interpreting results may limit optimal biomarker-driven treatment and patient access to genetic counseling.
Read More
Olaparib Leads PARP Inhibitors in Boosting OS for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
February 3rd 2025While all poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors improved progression-free survival, olaparib significantly extended overall survival (OS), making it a preferred option.
Read More
Niraparib Extends PFS, Time to Next Treatment in Patients With EOC, Especially BRCA-Mutated Cases
January 28th 2025First-line maintenance (1LM) niraparib significantly extends progression-free survival (rwPFS) and time to next treatment (rwTTNT) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), with the greatest benefit observed in those considered homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) and those with BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) tumors.
Read More
Real-World Study Highlights PARP Inhibitor Challenges in Ovarian Cancer Care
January 23rd 2025Nearly half of patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with first-line poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors experienced recurrence in this real-world study, emphasizing the need for enhanced strategies to optimize postrecurrence treatment.
Read More
Gynecologic Oncology Practices Evolve With Surgical De-Escalation Trends
January 21st 2025Researchers identified a 15-year shift toward surgical de-escalation in gynecologic oncology, marked by fewer surgical interventions, increased adoption of minimally invasive techniques, and a greater focus on fertility preservation and sentinel lymph node procedures.
Read More