Each stakeholder (employers, patients, family members, physicians, payers) values the impact of novel therapies differently, said Thomas Graf, MD, chief medical officer and vice president, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey.
Each stakeholder (employers, patients, family members, physicians, payers) values the impact of novel therapies differently, said Thomas Graf, MD, chief medical officer and vice president, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey.
Transcript
How does the impact of novel therapies vary between different stakeholders?
This is really interesting. For patients, it’s wonderful. We have treatments that are revolutionary, that can cure or dramatically improve the survival outcomes for diseases that really had no good options. The challenges though, they come with significant side effects. For some of them, you actually have to be hospitalized in the intensive care unit when you’re given the drug. That gives you some idea the danger associated with it. Even a successful therapy is a little bit challenging. From a payer perspective or provider perspective, understanding that risk to the patients and the members, understanding that impact of the cost, is a real challenge.
The other piece that I think most people haven’t really thought about is as we think about value in healthcare. Each stakeholder values it differently: employers, patients, family members, physicians, payers. But the biggest challenge is the time horizon that each of those recognize their value. For patients, the time horizon is obviously their life, they're open to measurement on and ongoing fashion. For employers, perhaps the time horizon that’s relevant is the time someone’s an employee. So, amortizing that half a million-dollar dose drug across the employed time makes a little more sense. Theoretically, as an insurance company, you’d value someone just for the time that they’re an insured member, which is a real challenge in these situations, because they need the treatment now, it’s gonna be very expensive now. In a year or two, as you start to break even on that member, of course you wouldn’t with these new therapies but conceptually, they may very well be insured somewhere else, so figuring out how to get that cost fare across the system, it is a real challenge. There’s no good answers yet.
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Could On-Body Delivery of Isatuximab Bring More Competition to Anti-CD38 Myeloma Treatment?
June 6th 2025Results for IRAKLIA show noninferiority for Sanofi's on-body delivery system for isatuximab, compared with IV administration. Patients overwhelmingly preferred the hands-free delivery option.
Read More
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Zanubrutinib Shows Durable Benefit for High-Risk CLL/SLL at 5 Years in SEQUOIA Trial
June 6th 2025Zanubrutinib showed long-term efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and deletion of the 17p chromosome, with progression-free survival similar to patients without high-risk disease characteristics.
Read More