It's important to have different metrics when it comes to cost containment because some patients are just sicker than others, explained Stella A. Safo, MD, assistant professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
It's important to have different metrics when it comes to cost containment because some patients are just sicker than others, explained Stella A. Safo, MD, assistant professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
With people living with HIV having significantly higher medical costs compared with people without infection, what challenges exist in the shift to value-based care in trying to lower costs while improving quality of care?
It is a very important area as we think about risk for certain patient populations and population health management to not have the same metrics when it comes to cost containment because some patients are just sicker than others and will always be sicker than others no matter what you do, short of cutting services. It’s specifically very true of our HIV population, who as they age, even if they’re being treated with antiretrovirals, still have higher incidences of cancer, still have higher incidences of certain acute infectious diseases, and so one of the first benchmarks is that we have to understand and we have to allocate more resources to this population that’s naturally sicker.
I think we also have to, as part of that, educate our system executives and leaders, that as they’re looking at their dashboards and looking at certain clinics and looking at certain patient populations, that they understand that the clinic outcomes of certain patients, even with the best and most proactive population management with team-based care and all of the things that we’ll do, that certain patients will always have a little bit more of a challenge meeting those cost and quality metrics just because of the nature of their disease. I see it as someone who does health system design, administrative work, and also as a clinician, I see it as my job to really help with the translation of that for all of the individuals involved in this. I think the question is a good one: how do we make sure that we don’t end up hurting a population like HIV-positive patients by requiring them to meet the same metrics, the same cost metrics as patients who might not be as acutely ill as they are? So, I think it’s a challenge we really need to figure out how to deal with.
IgE Mediation in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis, Concurrent Immune Disorders: Amy Paller, MD
August 4th 2025Amy Paller, MD, pediatric dermatologist and clinical researcher at Northwestern Medicine's Feinberg School of Medicine, discussed the potential impact of reducing immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis.
Read More
It Take a Village in Cancer Care: A Q&A With David Nguyen, MD
July 23rd 2025David Nguyen, MD, medical oncologist with Tufts Medicine and Lowell General Hospital, discusses the evolving landscape of advanced cancer treatments like chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies
Read More
Sexual, Gender Minority Communities Misperceive Risk of HIV
July 22nd 2025A new study shows low rates of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescribing to sexual and gender minority individuals living in North Carolina, indicating barriers like stigma and a misperception of risk as reasons for not using PrEP.
Read More