Curing cancer is something we all want to do, but logistical issues remain around translating that into practice, explained Sigrun Hallmeyer, MD, medical oncologist with Advocate Health.
In this interview with The American Journal of Managed Care®, Sigrun Hallmeyer, MD, medical oncologist with Advocate Health, addresses logistical holdups in precision medicine that may be preventing all patients who need this care from being able to access it. Among the top issues are inappropriate care and wasteful health care spend.
Transcript
Can you discuss potential policy priorities to increase equitable access to health care?
Curing cancer is, of course, the headline—that's what we're all wanting to do. But where we sort of ail and have an issue with is the logistics of how do you translate that. Precision medicine certainly plays a huge role in that, and health equity plays a huge role in that because access to care is one big problem that we have in this country. Another big problem, which I think is equally large, is that we have a lot of waste within our system. I would say probably a good third of our health care dollar is stuck in our system because we duplicate care, or we have care that is inappropriate, too late or early, wrong, whatever. With all that, we need to become better in becoming efficient and automated.
The utilization of appropriate discussion of precision medicine or personalized care should not be a boutique situation that is only offered to wealthy, highly educated patients who have the resources to come to the oncologist and ask for it. Or conversely, for patients who are seen in higher-level centers of care where the physicians are familiar with the precision medicine approach and have the logistical background that I discussed earlier, where you have all the pieces in place where such tests can actually lead to an impact on their care.
And so what I think would probably be the very best sort of societal approach to equity in care would be that we need to find a way to reflex these type of things. Very simply put, if you have, say, a lung cancer diagnosis, it shouldn't matter if you're diagnosed in South Chicago, or at MD Anderson in Houston, or at Sloan Kettering in New York City. Your specimen should be reflexively tested for targetable mutations and the patient and the physician should be equally enabled to use that information to define a targeted or precision medicine approach to their therapy.
Integrated CKD Care Model Cuts ED Visits by 30%, Boosts Specialized Treatment
April 21st 2025An analysis of an interdisciplinary care model for managing chronic kidney disease (CKD) shows hospital admissions dropped by 26% and emergency department (ED) visits decreased by 30% after clinic initiation.
Read More
Personalized Care Key as Tirzepatide Use Expands Rapidly
April 15th 2025Using commercial insurance claims data and the US launch of tirzepatide as their dividing point, John Ostrominski, MD, Harvard Medical School, and his team studied trends in the use of both glucose-lowering and weight-lowering medications, comparing outcomes between adults with and without type 2 diabetes.
Listen
No Major Shifts in OBGYN Practice Locations Found Post Dobbs Decision
April 21st 2025Despite widespread concern following the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, researchers found no significant changes nationwide in obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) practice locations.
Read More
Navigating Sport-Related Neurospine Injuries, Surgery, and Managed Care
February 25th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Arthur L. Jenkins III, MD, FACS, CEO of Jenkins NeuroSpine, to explore the intersection of advanced surgical care for sport-related neurospine injuries and managed care systems.
Listen