- Center on Health Equity & Access
- Clinical
- Health Care Cost
- Health Care Delivery
- Insurance
- Policy
- Technology
- Value-Based Care
Dr Robert Dubois Discusses Tradeoffs When Allocating Healthcare Resources
As we think about the healthcare spending situation that we’re in now, it’s kind of like Groundhog Day the movie where Bill Murray woke up each morning and relived the same day until he made changes in his life and was able to move forward, said Robert Dubois, MD, PhD, chief science officer and executive vice president, National Pharmaceutical Council.
As we think about the healthcare spending situation that we’re in now, it’s kind of like Groundhog Day the movie where Bill Murray woke up each morning and relived the same day until he made changes in his life and was able to move forward, said Dr Robert Dubois, MD, PhD, chief science officer and executive vice president, National Pharmaceutical Council.
Transcript (slightly modified)
What are the tradeoffs that policymakers have to consider when deciding where to allocate healthcare resources?
As we think about the healthcare spending situation that we’re in now, it’s kind of like Groundhog Day the movie where Bill Murray woke up each morning and relived the same day until he made changes in his life and was able to move forward. We’ve had the same finger pointing and spending discussions for decades. When we had 6% of GDP going to health, and 10%, and 15%, and now 18%, we kept saying we must do something. During the same 30 or 40 years, we’ve also known there’s an awful lot of waste and low-value care in the system.
We’ve also put those types of questions off over and over and over. So, we’re living in our own groundhog world. Now, Einstein said that if you keep doing the same thing over and over again and are hoping for a different outcome, that’s the definition of insanity. I believe where we are today is that we can’t keep kicking the can down the road. We are running out of what I might call head room. We are running out of extra dollars to spend.
If we don’t solve this, what the tradeoffs will be is that we don’t have the type of extraordinary innovation that we’ve noticed even in the last year, whether its gene treatments for blindness or CAR T therapy to cure previously fatal leukemia, or its contact lenses that measure your blood sugar, or it’s artificial skin for burns, or its artificial tracheas for other conditions. If we don’t get a handle on these kinds of tough choices, we’ll end up in a scenario where we can’t have this type of innovation, and the care that patients really do need, they won’t be able to receive.
Semaglutide Eligibility Expands to Over Half of US Adults
November 21st 2024Over half of the US adult population may benefit from semaglutide, a drug primarily used for weight loss and diabetes, although concerns about access and cost persist, especially considering its potential for wider health applications.
Read More
The Importance of Examining and Preventing Atrial Fibrillation
August 29th 2023At this year’s American Society for Preventive Cardiology Congress on CVD Prevention, Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM, delivered the Honorary Fellow Award Lecture, “The Imperative to Focus on the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation,” as the recipient of this year’s Honorary Fellow of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology award.
Listen
Promoting Equity in Public Health: Policy, Investment, and Community Engagement Solutions
June 28th 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Georges C. Benjamin, MD, executive director of the American Public Health Association, on the core takeaways of his keynote session at AHIP 2022 on public health policy and other solutions to promote equitable health and well-being.
Listen
