Richard Snyder, MD, executive vice president of Facilitated Health Networks and chief medical officer at Independence Blue Cross, explains how value-based agreements can benefit providers, patients, and payers.
Richard Snyder, MD, executive vice president of Facilitated Health Networks and chief medical officer at Independence Blue Cross, explains how value-based agreements can benefit providers, patients, and payers.
Transcript
How do value-based agreements benefit all stakeholders, including providers, patients, and payers?
If they’re done right, a value-based contract should benefit all 3. So, I’ll give you a couple of examples. First of all, from a patient perspective, we can define the benefits to reward patients with lower out-of-pocket costs if they go to a Blue distinction center or a center of excellence to get their care, and by steering them to such a location, they’re virtually guaranteed to have better clinical outcomes at a lower cost. That is the basis for the Blue Distinction Centers program that the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association has been promulgating in and around things like CAR T and Luxterna and other expensive drugs.
Typically, they reward the payer with lower total cost of care, and often times a warranty in the event the medication does not effectively control the diagnosis, and that obviously is a good thing since a large proportion of the care today is being paid for by employer groups through self-funded arrangements and these very, very costly drugs that are emerging from the pipeline put a significant stress on their PNLs, so from a payer perspective and ultimately our customers, the employer group, it helps to control costs and ensure quality outcomes and reward us with a warranty in the event the outcome is not optimal.
In the case of the provider, a lot of these arrangements do not require the provider to pay out the cost of stocking or storing these medications until a patient is waiting for them. With some of these programs, precertification barriers or limits can be reduced since they’re very unusual circumstances, rare diseases where the medication otherwise wouldn’t be used. So, I think there are plenty of reasons why the member—the patient, the payer—the ultimate customer the employer group or the government, and ultimately the provider delivering the service can benefit from value-based contracts.
New Insights Into Meth-Associated PAH Care Gaps: Anjali Vaidya, MD, on Closing the Divide
June 4th 2025Research from Anjali Vaidya, MD, FACC, FASE, FACP, Temple University Hospital, reveals critical care gaps for patients with methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and integrated support.
Read More
Laundromats as a New Frontier in Community Health, Medicaid Outreach
May 29th 2025Lindsey Leininger, PhD, and Allister Chang, MPA, highlight the potential of laundromats as accessible, community-based settings to support Medicaid outreach, foster trust, and connect families with essential health and social services.
Listen
The Role of Transplant in the Era of Novel MM Therapies: Harsh Parmar, MD
May 17th 2025Novel therapies for multiple myeloma (MM), including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell and bispecific antibodies, extend lives but raise concerns about treatment costs and adherence, and they haven't replaced stem cell transplantation, Harsh Parmar, MD, of Hackensack University Medical Center, explains.
Read More
Tailored Dosing for MM Matters More Than Drug Count: Ajai Chari, MD
April 25th 2025When it comes to treating multiple myeloma (MM), Ajai Chari, MD, argued that more is not always better. More intense treatment regimens, or those with more drugs, don't necessarily guarantee better outcomes.
Read More