When evaluating a patient’s response to a biologic for asthma, factors to consider include patient preference, safety, and symptoms, explained Nicola Hanania, MD, MS, pulmonary critical care physician and director, Airway Clinical Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
When evaluating a patient’s response to biologics, factors to consider include patient preference; safety, specifically the risk of anaphylaxis; symptoms; asthma control test; and lung fuction, explained Nicola Hanania, MD, MS, pulmonary critical care physician and director, Airway Clinical Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Transcript
How is biologic agent effectiveness evaluated in patients?
In clinical trials, we've tested these agents on their effect on exacerbation. So almost all these drugs were approved based on whether they reduce exacerbation. So it means large trials, and not only large, but long, 1-year trials. And in real life in my clinic, I can't wait for a year to know if the patient is responding, so I look at other things.
I look at how the patient is feeling. I look at asthma control. Lung function can sometimes improve dramatically with some of the agents, like anti-IL-4 [interleukin-4], for example. Lung function may not be affected dramatically by others. We look at exacerbation, it’s important. But because you need a long time to look to capture exacerbation, we look at other surrogates and patient satisfaction.
We obviously look at safety. In general, these agents are safe, but if one of them causes anaphylaxis, we have to stop. So there are some safety issues that we should consider as well. Although it's rare, it's been reported that some of them may be associated with anaphylaxis. We look at symptoms, asthma control test, and lung function.
Empowering Teams Begins With Human Connection: Missy Hopson, PhD
April 16th 2025Missy Hopson, PhD, Ochsner Health, discussed in detail the challenges of strengthening the patient-centered workforce, the power of community reputation for encouraging health care careers, and the influence of empowered workforces on patient outcomes.
Read More
Personalized Care Key as Tirzepatide Use Expands Rapidly
April 15th 2025Using commercial insurance claims data and the US launch of tirzepatide as their dividing point, John Ostrominski, MD, Harvard Medical School, and his team studied trends in the use of both glucose-lowering and weight-lowering medications, comparing outcomes between adults with and without type 2 diabetes.
Listen
Navigating Sport-Related Neurospine Injuries, Surgery, and Managed Care
February 25th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Arthur L. Jenkins III, MD, FACS, CEO of Jenkins NeuroSpine, to explore the intersection of advanced surgical care for sport-related neurospine injuries and managed care systems.
Listen
High-Impact Trials at ACC.25 Signal Shift in Chronic Disease Treatment
April 4th 2025Experts highlight groundbreaking research presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session (ACC.25), which emphasized a shift toward more personalized, evidence-based treatment strategies.
Read More
Bridging Education Gaps in Treatment for Scarring Alopecia With Innovative Approaches
March 28th 2025Crystal Aguh, MD, FAAD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine faculty, highlights the critical need for comprehensive education on hair loss across diverse hair types, stressing the importance of understanding inflammatory pathways for developing targeted therapies.
Read More