Linda Frisk, PharmD, of Arizona Oncology, discusses the role of the pharmacist in new value-based payment models and her experience with the Oncology Care Model (OCM).
Linda Frisk, PharmD, of Arizona Oncology, discusses the role of the pharmacist in new value-based payment models and her experience with the Oncology Care Model (OCM).
What is the role of the oncology pharmacist in new value-based payment models?
I am part of the OCM, so cost of care is important to us, and managing our patients, preventing those side effects from getting worse, interacting with the physician, making sure that what we’re dispensing is the right medicine, the right dose, not auto-filling but checking with the physician, is going to reduce cost of care. It’s going to reduce emergency department visits. It’s going to reduce hospitalization. It’s going to make sure that we don’t dispense a medication that the patient can’t use.
What have been some of the biggest challenges you've had in implementing the Oncology Care Model?
In implementing OCM, there was a lot of a ramp up phase. Oral medications is probably the hardest part, because they don’t all come through us, so it’s a lot of phone calling to patients, to specialty pharmacies, to find out just the basic information that we need to get them enrolled, to get their care plan billed, and to find out where they’re at in their therapy. It would be much easier my sites, because they’re right in the clinics, could dispense the medications, but we know that because of insurance and [pharmacy benefit managers] and things like that, that we can’t dispense all of them. That makes it difficult.
What role does the pharmacist play in implementing clinical pathways?
I’m part of US Oncology McKesson, and we have the value pathways by [National Comprehensive Cancer Network], and they are integrated into our [electronic medical record], so every time that the physicians order a new regimen, they do go through our pathways. And if they don’t follow the pathways, then they have to give a reason why. So, we are very much integrated into that system.
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
In VERIFY, Rusfertide Spares Most Patients With PV a Phlebotomy for 32 Weeks, Improves QOL
June 3rd 2025Adding rusfertide to standard of care more than doubled the share of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who did not meet criteria for a phlebotomy, according to data from the VERIFY trial.
Read More
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Depth of Responses, PFS in Transplant-Ineligible Patients Match Overall Findings in CEPHEUS
June 2nd 2025Quadruplet therapy is now the accepted standard for patients newly diagnosed with myeloma who are ineligible for transplant; there is debate whether all newly diagnosed patients should have this regimen.
Read More
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Plus Pertuzumab Improves PFS vs Standard Care in HER2+ Breast Cancer
June 2nd 2025Trastuzumab deruxtecan plus pertuzumab demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in HER2-positive breast cancer, potentially representing a new standard of care.
Read More