- Center on Health Equity & Access
- Clinical
- Health Care Cost
- Health Care Delivery
- Insurance
- Policy
- Technology
- Value-Based Care
Dr Lawrence Shulman Discusses Pathways and Improvements in Breast Cancer Treatment
Improvements in treatments have led to less toxicities and better quality of life for patients with breast cancer, said Lawrence N. Shulman, MD, director of the Center for Global Cancer Medicine at the Abramson Cancer Center, and professor of Medicine at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
Improvements in treatments have led to less toxicities and better quality of life for patients with breast cancer, said Lawrence N. Shulman, MD, director of the Center for Global Cancer Medicine at the Abramson Cancer Center, and professor of Medicine at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
Transcript
How is adherence to clinical pathways improving outcomes for patients with breast cancer and delivering high-value care?
Well, we know a few things about pathways. One of the things we know is that if you do them appropriately, you reduce variation in care—it improves standardization. And we know from a lot of studies, reducing variation in care accomplishes 2 things. First of all, it improves the quality of care, reduces errors, reduces inappropriate treatments. We also know that reduction in variation results in decreased costs for the health system overall, and often, for the patients, as well.
How have novel therapies allowed for less toxic ways to treat breast cancer?
Things are pretty different now than they were in the breast cancer area when I started, which was a very long time ago. And I thought a little bit about the patients that I cared for in the ’70s and the ’80s versus the patients that I care for now.
And 2 things have happened. One is that we have developed therapies that are, in fact, often more effective but less toxic. And we’ve also learned to control the toxicities of the therapies that we use much better than we have in the past. And so, the quality of life for breast cancer patients undergoing treatment is much better now than it was even a decade ago. And I think will continue to improve. And that’s true in both short-term toxicities and long-term toxicities.
And it’s not just the drugs. The surgery that we perform now leaves patients with fewer long-term complications. The way we give radiation now results in better cosmetic outcomes and fewer long-term toxicities. So, all aspects of our treatment have really improved over the years.
Targeting the Root of gMG With Inebilizumab: A Q&A With Richard Nowak, MD, MS
June 24th 2025In this interview, Richard J. Nowak, MD, MS, principal investigator of the MINT trial of inebilizumab for generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), discusses the trial’s key findings, including significant improvements in patient- and physician-assessed outcomes, as well as longer-term implications and future areas of investigation.
Read More
Stuck in Prior Auth Purgatory: The Hidden Costs of Health Care Delays
June 19th 2025Delays, denials, and endless paperwork—prior authorization isn’t just a headache for providers; it’s a barrier for patients who need timely care, explains Colin Banas, MD, MHA, chief medical officer with DrFirst.
Listen
Addressing Cancer Care Challenges for Patients, and Ensuring Equity: Coral Omene, MD, PhD
June 22nd 2025Delivering value-based cancer care requires overcoming hurdles to access care and tailoring care that prioritizes the quality-of-life metrics the patient values, explained Coral Omene, MD, PhD.
Read More
Accessibility Important After FDA Approves Lenacapavir for PrEP: Q&A With Colleen Kelley, MD, MPH
June 20th 2025The approval of lenacapavir, a form of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), marks significant progress in preventing HIV, making it vital for the treatment to be available and accessible to those most vulnerable, explains Colleen Kelley, MD, MPH, Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University.
Read More
