Although nilotinib as a first-line therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia is a more effective treatment than imatinib, nilotinib's side effects are too much for patients.
Although nilotinib as a first-line therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia is a more effective treatment than imatinib, nilotinib’s side effects are too much for patients, according to a study from Novartis presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
Giuseppe Saglio, MD, one of the co-authors on the study and a professor of internal medicine at the University of Turin in Italy, explained that while just 10% of patients who stopped imatinib did so because of side effects, 20% of patients on nilotinib stopped treatment because of side effects.
“So I think, probably, we have to reconsider all this data to suggest which is the best appropriate treatment and particular dosage of the drug as first-line therapy,” Dr Saglio said.
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Ibrutinib Benefits R/R CLL, but Combo Therapy Works Better
March 5th 2025Ibrutinib remains a key treatment for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but findings suggest that combining it with other therapies can improve response rates and may allow for treatment discontinuation in some patients.
Read More