At the American College of Cardiology 66th Scientific Session, Eric Peterson, MD, professor of medicine in the division of cardiology at Duke University School of Medicine, presented study findings that showed patients discontinued rivaroxaban less frequently than other anticoagulation agents. These results are important, he said, because regardless of what a clinician prescribes, “it’s the drugs that patients take that make the difference.”
At the American College of Cardiology 66th Scientific Session, Eric Peterson, MD, professor of medicine in the division of cardiology at Duke University School of Medicine and executive director of the Duke Clinical Research Institute, presented study findings that showed patients discontinued rivaroxaban less frequently than other anticoagulation agents. These results are important, he said, because regardless of what a clinician prescribes, “it’s the drugs that patients take that make the difference.”
Transcript (slightly modified)
Who was the study population for your research, and what were the findings?
We studied over 220,000 patients who had atrial fibrillation and looked at their various treatment patterns as well as their adherence to the medicines they were treated with. The major findings were that rivaroxaban, one of the novel oral agents, had higher rates of adherence, proportion of days covered greater than 80%, we found that over 80% of patients were able to take the medicines as prescribed. In contrast, some of the other agents, apixaban and dabigatran, were much lower at 70 to 75%, which was significantly less, and then even lower on those patients who were treated with warfarin.
Why did patients discontinue rivaroxaban less frequently than other anticoagulants?
I think it’s a combination of things, but in part that medicine once a day makes it easier for patients to take and it’s, in addition, well tolerated with regards to bleeding issues.
Why is it important to show that rivaroxaban is not just safe and effective, but also tolerable to patients?
At the end of the day, it’s the drugs that patients take that make the difference. We could order anything we can prescribe to patients, but if they don’t take it on a routine and consistent basis, then in fact the benefits that we expect will not be seen.
How do these findings contribute to the real-world evidence supporting rivaroxaban?
From clinical trials we get efficacy and safety, but from real-world data we get how patients actually take those medications and what it will mean to them long-term. In our study we showed that in fact rivaroxaban is better tolerated, is taken longer and more consistently by patients, which will result ultimately in hopefully better outcomes.
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
A Novel Approach to Chronic GVHD With Axatilimab: Dr Daniel Wolff
October 18th 2024The latest therapy approved to treat chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has a new target different than the other approved therapies. Daniel Wolff, MD, also discusses future research on axatilimab to treat chronic GVHD earlier.
Read More
Bimekizumab Poised to Tackle Unmet HS Treatment Needs
October 18th 2024Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory, chronic disease with very high symptom and physical burdens, and it can get progressively worse over time if it's inadequately treated, explained Amit Garg, MD, founding chair, Department of Dermatology, Northwell Health.
Read More