At the American College of Cardiology 66th Scientific Session, Eric Peterson, MD, professor of medicine in the division of cardiology at Duke University School of Medicine, presented study findings that showed patients discontinued rivaroxaban less frequently than other anticoagulation agents. These results are important, he said, because regardless of what a clinician prescribes, “it’s the drugs that patients take that make the difference.”
At the American College of Cardiology 66th Scientific Session, Eric Peterson, MD, professor of medicine in the division of cardiology at Duke University School of Medicine and executive director of the Duke Clinical Research Institute, presented study findings that showed patients discontinued rivaroxaban less frequently than other anticoagulation agents. These results are important, he said, because regardless of what a clinician prescribes, “it’s the drugs that patients take that make the difference.”
Transcript (slightly modified)
Who was the study population for your research, and what were the findings?
We studied over 220,000 patients who had atrial fibrillation and looked at their various treatment patterns as well as their adherence to the medicines they were treated with. The major findings were that rivaroxaban, one of the novel oral agents, had higher rates of adherence, proportion of days covered greater than 80%, we found that over 80% of patients were able to take the medicines as prescribed. In contrast, some of the other agents, apixaban and dabigatran, were much lower at 70 to 75%, which was significantly less, and then even lower on those patients who were treated with warfarin.
Why did patients discontinue rivaroxaban less frequently than other anticoagulants?
I think it’s a combination of things, but in part that medicine once a day makes it easier for patients to take and it’s, in addition, well tolerated with regards to bleeding issues.
Why is it important to show that rivaroxaban is not just safe and effective, but also tolerable to patients?
At the end of the day, it’s the drugs that patients take that make the difference. We could order anything we can prescribe to patients, but if they don’t take it on a routine and consistent basis, then in fact the benefits that we expect will not be seen.
How do these findings contribute to the real-world evidence supporting rivaroxaban?
From clinical trials we get efficacy and safety, but from real-world data we get how patients actually take those medications and what it will mean to them long-term. In our study we showed that in fact rivaroxaban is better tolerated, is taken longer and more consistently by patients, which will result ultimately in hopefully better outcomes.
New Insights Into Meth-Associated PAH Care Gaps: Anjali Vaidya, MD, on Closing the Divide
June 4th 2025Research from Anjali Vaidya, MD, FACC, FASE, FACP, Temple University Hospital, reveals critical care gaps for patients with methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and integrated support.
Read More
Laundromats as a New Frontier in Community Health, Medicaid Outreach
May 29th 2025Lindsey Leininger, PhD, and Allister Chang, MPA, highlight the potential of laundromats as accessible, community-based settings to support Medicaid outreach, foster trust, and connect families with essential health and social services.
Listen
Tailored Dosing for MM Matters More Than Drug Count: Ajai Chari, MD
April 25th 2025When it comes to treating multiple myeloma (MM), Ajai Chari, MD, argued that more is not always better. More intense treatment regimens, or those with more drugs, don't necessarily guarantee better outcomes.
Read More
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More