David Yeomans, PhD, associate professor of anesthesiology, perioperative, and pain medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine, discusses the challenges of evaluating pain associated with migraine.
Secondary symptoms like nausea also need to be taken into account when evaluting migraine treatment efficacy, said David Yeomans, PhD, associate professor of anesthesiology, perioperative, and pain medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine.
Transcript
Because pain is subjective, can you elaborate on some of the challenges of studying migraine?
It's a fairly standard way that companies, for example, will do that, that the FDA has accepted that methodology. But you're right, the pain is clearly subjective. But what you do is you look at pain, you've probably heard of the 0 to 10 scale. You go to the doctor, they say how much pain, "Oh it's a 6." With migraine, they use a different scale. It's a 4-point scale, where you say, severe, moderate, mild or none. And it's a little easier for people to categorize. And so there's that. What you're looking for is a decrease from severe or moderate down to mild or none. That's considered a positive response.
But you also have to look at the secondary symptoms. So, what's called the most bothersome secondary symptoms, like nausea, or photophobia, or phonophobia. So whatever is the most bothersome to a patient. You look at not only the pain level, but how much your treatment is affecting this secondary thing.
There's also some biomarkers that people are investigating. For example, we know when these trigeminal neurons are active, they release something called CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide. It's a neurotransmitter. That's the target for some of these newer drugs that have come out, either CGRP antibodies or CGRP antagonists to block CGRP. Turns out, you can measure CGRP either in the blood or the saliva. It looks like when CGRP is elevated, that's a clear strong correlation to how much pain you have. It's not established yet, that is to say, the FDA doesn't accept it yet. But it looks like that should be a decent biochemical marker of how active these pain neurons in the trigeminal neuron are. Pain is not in the peripheral nerves, pain is up here in the cortex in the brain. There's a lot of steps in between. But for something like this, just measuring CGRP seems like it's a pretty good indicator of how much pain a person's having.
MINT Trial 26-Week Data Show Inebilizumab for gMG Is Effective and Safe
April 1st 2025These are data to week 26 on the monoclonal antibody and antineoplastic agent; data out to week 52 of the MINT trial will be presented in a late-breaking oral session at the upcoming American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting.
Read More
Navigating Sport-Related Neurospine Injuries, Surgery, and Managed Care
February 25th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Arthur L. Jenkins III, MD, FACS, CEO of Jenkins NeuroSpine, to explore the intersection of advanced surgical care for sport-related neurospine injuries and managed care systems.
Listen
Bridging Education Gaps in Treatment for Scarring Alopecia With Innovative Approaches
March 28th 2025Crystal Aguh, MD, FAAD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine faculty, highlights the critical need for comprehensive education on hair loss across diverse hair types, stressing the importance of understanding inflammatory pathways for developing targeted therapies.
Read More
FDA Approves Cabozantinib for Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
March 26th 2025With strong progression-free survival benefits demonstrated in the CABINET trial and updates to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, this approval reinforces cabozantinib’s role in improving outcomes for patients facing these challenging cancers.
Read More