David Spencer, MD, director of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center and professor of neurology at Oregon Health and Science University, talks about the first-in-human trial of interneuron cell therapy for treatment of focal epilepsy and explains the next steps.
The first phase of a first-in-human trial of NRTX-1001, an intraneuron cell therapy treatment for epilepsy, focused on safety, and next will come a randomized, controlled trial to assess efficacy, according to David Spencer, MD, director of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center and professor of neurology at Oregon Health and Science University.
Transcript
How long is the clinical trial for interneuron cell therapy for treatment of focal epilepsy, and what are the next steps if it proves to be successful?
The cell therapy approach for treating epilepsy that we're exploring is a major commitment to the participants who've taken a big step to join into this study. It's a long-term approach. From the perspective of a person entering into the trial, the main part of the study lasts 2 years, but there's an extension study that continues beyond that for up to 15 years, where we'll continue to follow people and track their outcomes.
From the perspective of the overall study, It has 2 phases. The first phase we’re especially focusing on the safety of doing the cell implants, and so we're going at a cautious pace. After the first implant was completed last June, there was a waiting period, there was a lot of safety assessments and a committee met to ensure that the outcome looks good in that person before we moved on to doing an implant in the second person, which was in last fall of 2022. We're anticipating 5 participants receiving the cell implants, another pause in assessments, a second 5 potentially at a higher dose of cells.
And then at that point in the trial, we'll shift into a hybrid approach continuing to look at safety, but also looking more closely at efficacy. The second phase will be a small, randomized controlled trial, so some people will get cell therapy initially, others will get delayed therapy, and we'll try to look very carefully at the responses that are very specific to cell implants.
STEER Data Open Door to SMA Gene Therapy for Wider Age Range of Children
March 19th 2025Delivery of onasemnogene abeparvovec into the intrathecal space was safe and effective for children with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) aged 2 to 17 years, who had previously been shut out of receiving gene therapy.
Read More
Navigating Sport-Related Neurospine Injuries, Surgery, and Managed Care
February 25th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Arthur L. Jenkins III, MD, FACS, CEO of Jenkins NeuroSpine, to explore the intersection of advanced surgical care for sport-related neurospine injuries and managed care systems.
Listen
Neurologists Share Tips for Securing Patient Access to Gene Therapies
March 19th 2025Tenacious efforts at every level, from the individual clinician to the hospital to the state to Congress, will be needed to make sure patients can access life-saving gene therapies for neuromuscular diseases.
Read More
EMBARK Data Show Continued Improvements With DMD Gene Therapy
March 19th 2025Data from the EMBARK trial of delandistrogene moxeparvovec in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) show that benefits in functional outcomes, gene expression, and muscle imaging persist 2 years after receiving the gene therapy.
Read More
How Access to SMA Treatment Varies Globally and by Insurance Type
March 18th 2025Posters presented at the 2025 Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) Clinical & Scientific Conference show that therapeutic advances in treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are not uniformly making it into the hands of patients who could benefit.
Read More