When measuring disease severity and progression in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), there are several approaches that provide different information and have varying strengths and weaknesses, according to Daniel Kantor, MD, president of Kantor Neurology.
When measuring disease severity and progression in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), there are several approaches that provide different information and have varying strengths and weaknesses, according to Daniel Kantor, MD, president of Kantor Neurology.
Transcript
How is disease severity and progression in patients with multiple sclerosis being measured?
Sometimes MS gets compared to a snowflake. We say that everybody with MS is unique in their own way and beautiful in their own way, much like a snowflake. That can also mean, though, that it’s difficult to study large populations of people with multiple sclerosis, because different people have different symptoms.
What we’ve been able to do since the early ‘90s is really study multiple sclerosis systematically, and we’ve used as our primary end point in many of our studies something called the annualized relapse rate. We also use, sometimes as a co—primary end point and sometimes as a secondary end point, we use some form of disability measurement. Now, there’s problems with both the measurement of annualized relapse rate as well as disability.
For example, annualized relapse rate looks at a population. It says, well, there’s 100 people in this group, each person had 1 relapse, that’s 100 relapses over that year, that’s an annualized relapse rate of 1. If we have 100 people, and 50 people have 2 relapses or attacks and 50 people have 0, that’s still a total of 100 relapses over a population of 100 people over the course of a year, which is still an annualized relapse rate of 1. Two very separate populations, very, very distinct, yet they have the same annualized relapse rate.
The problem with our disability measurement is that we use a scale that unfortunately is not linear. We’re using a scale called the Expanded Disability Status Scale score, and that says that 0 means no disability and 10 means death due to multiple sclerosis. But 6 means you used 1 cane, 6.5 means bilateral support, 7 means that you’re sometimes in a wheelchair, and as you can see it drops off very fast.
We are using other measures of disability. We’ve tried to use something called the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, and that looks not just at walking at 25 feet, that also looks at using your hands in something called the 9-hole peg test, also using your thinking, and we’ve changed a little bit some of the testing that we’re doing. Some people have proposed looking at low-contrast visual acuity, meaning you look at that eye chart but what you do is you just gray it out a little bit, that becomes harder for somebody with optic neuritis to see. And so those are other clinical ways that we’re trying to measure disability.
New Insights Into Meth-Associated PAH Care Gaps: Anjali Vaidya, MD, on Closing the Divide
June 4th 2025Research from Anjali Vaidya, MD, FACC, FASE, FACP, Temple University Hospital, reveals critical care gaps for patients with methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and integrated support.
Read More
Laundromats as a New Frontier in Community Health, Medicaid Outreach
May 29th 2025Lindsey Leininger, PhD, and Allister Chang, MPA, highlight the potential of laundromats as accessible, community-based settings to support Medicaid outreach, foster trust, and connect families with essential health and social services.
Listen
Tailored Dosing for MM Matters More Than Drug Count: Ajai Chari, MD
April 25th 2025When it comes to treating multiple myeloma (MM), Ajai Chari, MD, argued that more is not always better. More intense treatment regimens, or those with more drugs, don't necessarily guarantee better outcomes.
Read More
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More