As more practices adopt the COME HOME model, they are adapting it to fit their needs, explained Barbara McAneny, MD, chief medical officer of New Mexico Oncology Hematology Consultants. However, some practices may not have the resources to keep up with data collection requirements while ramping up clinical interventions.
As more practices adopt the COME HOME model, they are adapting it to fit their needs, explained Barbara McAneny, MD, chief medical officer of New Mexico Oncology Hematology Consultants. However, some practices may not have the resources to keep up with data collection requirements while ramping up clinical interventions.
Transcript (slightly modified)
How has the COME HOME model changed over the years?
At the beginning of COME HOME, it was 7 practices across the country. My practice, New Mexico Cancer Center, had done a lot of these policies and procedures because I take care of poor people, and having them be able to afford cancer care was obviously very important. As we moved it to the other practices, it had to adapt a little bit to work in each individual market. Some of the practices just did their Medicare patients; some like New Mexico Cancer Center expanded and did these processes for all of our patients.
It has changed a bit when it turned into the Oncology Care Model. The data collection requirements and the idea of superimposing the risk structure, this payment structure, on top of it is very different. When we did COME HOME, we added up all the costs of paying nurses to sit on the phone talking to patients as part of the triage pathway, the extra time it takes to have nurses and others educating patients as to how their disease would work and how to use our system to keep themselves healthy, and be able to have the opportunity costs of having expanded hours and having the ability to see patients the day they need to be seen.
When we added up all those costs, it came out more than the $160 per month that is the MEOS [Monthly Enhanced Oncology Services] payment, so I’m concerned that as it goes towards Medicare that practices will not have sufficient resources to really ramp up the clinical interventions that they need in their practices to really make it work. I also think that there’s a risk, like there was with the accountable care organizations, that all of the money paid in the MEOS payment will go towards the data collection to give back to Medicare, and that’s not really the intent.
Delayed Diagnoses, Oxygen Therapy Use Linked to Worse Outcomes in Patients With Fibrotic ILD
October 21st 2024Posters presented at the CHEST 2024 annual meeting revealed that delays in diagnosing fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) can negatively impact overall survival, while supplemental oxygen therapy may exacerbate clinical burdens through increased rates of acute exacerbations and hospitalizations.
Read More
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Penn Medicine's Dr Justin Bekelman
December 19th 2023Justin Bekelman, MD, director of the Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, sat with our hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, for our final episode of 2023 to discuss the importance of collaboration between academic medicine and community oncology and testing innovative cancer care delivery in these settings.
Listen
Ways Providers, Payers Can Ensure Biomarker Testing Is Done in Cancer Care
October 18th 2024There is a role for both payers and providers to make small changes that would increase the use of biomarker testing to ensure patients are receiving the appropriate treatment, said Susan Wescott, RPh, MBA, senior director of managed care pharmacy, Mayo Clinic.
Read More