Different value frameworks offer different things, as Alan Balch, PhD, CEO of the Patient Advocate Foundation, explained that each framework has various other objectives in mind. Balch differentiates frameworks based upon whether their objectives reach individual or population-based levels.
Different value frameworks offer different things, as Alan Balch, PhD, CEO of the Patient Advocate Foundation, explained that each framework has various other objectives in mind. Balch differentiates frameworks based upon whether their objectives reach individual or population-based levels.
Transcript (slightly modified)
These are a number of different value assessment frameworks that have been created (NCCN, ASCO, ICER). How can patients and providers differentiate between them?
I think there will be differences between them just naturally because they often have different points of departure in terms of what they’re trying to address. So, some are very purposefully designed to deliver information to one stakeholder community than another. So for example, ICER is very explicit about having the outcomes of their information really being geared towards policy makers and providers whereas the NCCN evidence blocks is really geared towards generating a conversation between the patient and the provider and ASCO’s value framework is similar.
So given a sort of form follows function, so given that they have different purposes, you are going to see naturally the methodologies and the way they’re constructed will be different, depending upon what the purpose is of that value tool. So I do think there will be differences and probably the biggest thing that leads to differences in them is at what scale are they trying to define value, or define a particular variable.
And to me, the two more natural stratifications, there are individual level versus population level. So for example, when the evidence blocks for NCCN talks about affordability, it’s really at the population scale whereas the ASCO value framework, when they really talk about cost, it’s literally a blank right now because it’s meant to be personalized to the individual. At least for cost at the cost variable in that framework is very individualized whereas in other frameworks, the cost variable is very much at the population level. And that will lead naturally to differences in how that information is conveyed to patients and what information goes into creating, populating that particular variable in the framework.
New Insights Into Meth-Associated PAH Care Gaps: Anjali Vaidya, MD, on Closing the Divide
June 4th 2025Research from Anjali Vaidya, MD, FACC, FASE, FACP, Temple University Hospital, reveals critical care gaps for patients with methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and integrated support.
Read More
Laundromats as a New Frontier in Community Health, Medicaid Outreach
May 29th 2025Lindsey Leininger, PhD, and Allister Chang, MPA, highlight the potential of laundromats as accessible, community-based settings to support Medicaid outreach, foster trust, and connect families with essential health and social services.
Listen
Tailored Dosing for MM Matters More Than Drug Count: Ajai Chari, MD
April 25th 2025When it comes to treating multiple myeloma (MM), Ajai Chari, MD, argued that more is not always better. More intense treatment regimens, or those with more drugs, don't necessarily guarantee better outcomes.
Read More
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More