April Armstrong, MD, MPH, of University of California, Los Angeles, discussed how recent biologics advancements improved moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment.
April Armstrong, MD, MPH, professor and chief of dermatology at University of California, Los Angeles, discussed the 2 FDA-approved biologics for atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment and how they helped improve treatment of patients with moderate to severe AD. Armstrong also touched on how to best implement these new treatments, using a patient by patient approach.
Transcript
How have recent advancements in biologics improved your ability to treat patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis?
I think the area of biologics development in atopic dermatitis is very exciting. I think, currently, as you know, we have 2 FDA-approved biologics to treat patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: dupilumab and tralokinumab. Both of them have really revolutionized the way in which our AD patients are being managed and cared for in our clinics.
That being said, we still have room to go in terms of making sure that more patients can benefit from advanced treatments, and there is 1 molecule in late phase development: lebrikizumab, which is an IL [interleukin]-13 inhibitor that is also targeting one of the key cytokines for atopic dermatitis. The clinical data on that have shown good efficacy, a good safety profile, and I think it will be very promising as a new option for patients with atopic dermatitis.
I think, overall, one of the things as clinicians that we want to recognize is that, as these newer therapies become available, I think patient selection is one of the key areas that we want to figure out. Right now, we don't have an easily accessible way of determining which patient may respond to one therapy or another, so it's a little bit of a guessing game sometimes.
When we look at atopic dermatitis, which is a very heterogeneous disease, we oftentimes may experience some patients responding well to one therapy but may not respond as well to another therapy. I think the complement of biologics with oral therapies; for example, JAK [janus kinase] inhibitors, which can actually hit also multiple targets. I think both of those classes being available for patients is critical because we will see that not everyone responds to 1 type of medication, and having multiple choices will allow us to figure out over time which may be the best for our patients.
Inside the Center's MDD Value Model and Its Use of Dynamic Pricing
May 13th 2025Larragem Raines, MS, of the Center for Innovation & Value Research, discusses the organization's major depressive disorder (MDD) open-source value model, dynamic pricing, and the future role of artificial intelligence in care.
Listen
Real-World Data Show Bevacizumab Benefits Only High-Risk Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
May 13th 2025In line with previous clinical trial findings, real-world data show that bevacizumab improves outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and high-risk prognostic factors.
Read More
For Patients Who Cannot Wait, This Off-the-Shelf CAR NK Treatment for AML Leaves Healthy Cells Alone
May 12th 2025First part of a 2-part interview with Stephen Strickland, MD, MSCI, director of leukemia research for Sarah Cannon Research Institute. Strickland recently presented data from a phase 1 trial of SENTI-202, an investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) natural killer (NK) cell therapy.
Read More
Global Analysis Sheds Light on Women’s Cancer Trends
May 11th 2025As National Women’s Health Week approaches, new global data highlighting projected rises in breast and ovarian cancer through 2050 is prompting renewed calls for gender-specific prevention strategies that address evolving health risks for women.
Read More