Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD: Recently, the FDA went into a new model—what they called the Oncology Center of Excellence—and they have agreed to do that, and they’re moving forward with it. I will say that I was involved in some of those discussions. The American Cancer Society supported it, and so did a number of other cancer advocacy organizations and influential individuals.
In the cancer space, most of us feel the FDA has tried to be as responsive as possible. I know everyone doesn’t agree with that, but they’ve tried to be as responsible as possible to get new drugs through the pipeline when appropriate, and they’ve revised their rules. They’re looking at smaller populations of patients. They’re not requiring randomized trials when there’s a clear unmet need and we have a drug that really works. They have really worked much quicker than was the case in the past.
Our hope is that, with this new Oncology Center of Excellence, the FDA is going to do even better, because when you talk to the folks at the FDA you learn that some experts are over here, some experts may be in a different place, and the lines of responsibility are getting blurred.
So, you may have a biologic medication that would be tested in lung cancer, but the tests to see if a patient is eligible for that medicine are over in a different department, and maybe a device needs to be approved and that’s in a different department. By bringing that together and hopefully streamlining the process, we’ll all be better off. Having said that—and I don’t mean this negatively—the reality is that it’s a government agency. So, making this happen is going to take a lot of effort on the part of a lot of people. But we, the American Cancer Society, think that it’s a step in the right direction.
Polypharmacy Common in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Driving Risk of Serious Drug Interactions
August 13th 2025More than 8 in 10 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were taking 5 or more medications at once, a practice linked to older age, multiple comorbidities, and more than 2000 potential drug-to-drug interactions.
Read More
Assessment of Variation in Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring Among Commercially Insured Patients
August 13th 2025Ambulatory cardiac monitors’ clinical and economic outcomes vary; one long-term continuous monitor brand showed greater arrhythmia diagnosis, fewer retests and cardiovascular events, and lower health care resource use and costs.
Read More