Recent analysis supports the potential importance of using biosimiliars of granulocyte colony stimulating factor to manage neutropenia affecting post-chemotherapy and post-op patients.
The potential of biosimiliars of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to be important in the management of neutropenia has been supported by a recent analysis published in Biologics: Target and Therapy.
The analysis, with evidence compiled by researchers from the University Hospital of Verona in Italy, reviewed both biologic and economic factors of using G-CSF biosimilars to treat neutropenia that may affect post-chemotherapy and post-op patients.
Neutropenia can manifest as a low neutrophil count or high fever, as a result of infections that patients contract after specific treatments. G-CSFs, biological growth factors that promote the proliferation, differentiation, and activation of neutrophils in the bone marrow, have long been used to boost the number of circulating neutrophils in a patient either prior to or during treatment. This would allow a patient to start with a higher amount of neutrophils to compensate for the ones that would be lost as a result of the treatment.
The strategy of use includes using the G-CSF as “primary” prophylaxis (prevention) to reduce the risk of developing fever when the risk is over 20% likelihood. Evidence from multiple randomized trials and meta-analyses also support the benefit of primary prophylaxis in reducing the frequency of hospitalization for antibiotic therapy and documented infection. There is less evidence supporting G-CSF use as secondary prophylaxis (when the patient had a neutropenic fever in a previous course of chemotherapy and is expected to do so again) or as an adjunct to an antibiotic regimen.
Currently, the most commonly used type of G-CSF is filgrastim. The patent for filgrastim expired in 2006 in Europe and in 2013 in the US, and since then, the efficacy and safety of using a biosimilar has been a topic of interest in clinical practice. The biosimilar licensure pathway is part of an effort to encourage competition and thus keep drug prices low.
Results from studies conducted by several centers around the world have shown the benefit of biosimilars in stem cell transplant in neutropenic patients. Other trials have confirmed the bioequivalence of biosimilar G-CSF and their originator products. The European Medicines Agency has approved 16 G-CSF biosimilars since 2008, 3 of which are commercially available. The US approved Zarxio, a filgrastim biosimilar, in March 2015.
Aside from efficacy and safety, the review also found that prophylaxis or treatment of neutropenia with biosimilars is cost efficient. Biosimilars can play “an important role by offering the opportunity to reduce costs, thus contributing to the financial sustainability of treatment programs,” analysts wrote.
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Exploring the Complexities of Biosimilars and Interchangeability
October 30th 2024A panel of industry experts discussed the complexities of biosimilars and interchangeability, emphasizing the challenges in adoption, the need for regulatory and legislative solutions, and the importance of education to combat misinformation.
Read More
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Sarcoma Care: Biomarker Advancements Shape the Future
October 24th 2024At the regional Institute for Value-Based Medicine® event in Boston, Vinayak Venkataraman, MD, medical oncologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, was a panelist for the discussion, “Recent Advancements in Identifying Predictive Biomarkers for Sarcomas."
Read More