In a new commentary in JAMA Internal Medicine, authors highlighted the results of the hospital-at-home (HaH) program at Mount Sinai Health System that resulted in the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee recommending full implementation of the bundled HaH program, as well as clinical and policy issues raised by the program.
As part of national efforts to reform care through new payment models, the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) unanimously recommended a payment model for a hospital-at-home (HaH) program bundled with 30 days of postacute care.
In a new commentary in JAMA Internal Medicine, authors highlighted the results of the HaH program at Mount Sinai Health System that resulted in PTAC recommending full implementation of the bundled HaH program, as well as clinical and policy issues raised by the program.
Read more about the Mount Sinai HaH model.
The authors noted that the Mount Sinai HaH program had positive outcomes that mirrored previous studies on HaH, such as reduced average length of stay and improved patient satisfaction, but the Mount Sinai program also demonstrated lower readmission rates.
The bundled payment model proposed to PTAC, called HaH-Plus, “steps outside of the traditional ACO [accountable care organization] and bundled payment paradigms by fundamentally reimagining the definition of acute hospital care and payment,” the authors explain. Paired with technological advancements, the HaH-Plus model could have “far-reaching implications for care delivery.”
However, there are not currently any existing standards and requirements for HaH programs, but if there is a payment model that incentivizes shifting patients to the home, these standards and requirements would need to be developed. In addition, the bundled payment would need to account for potential unintended consequences, such as inappropriate conversion of outpatient encounters to HaH episodes.
The authors also wrote that the HaH bundled payment would need to be coordinated with other programs. One suggestion is to implement HaH-Plus within existing ACOs first, but the aspects of such an implementation are unclear.
“Given these considerations, a rigorous test of the HaH-Plus payment model in select conditions seems more appropriate than the wide-scale implementation recommended by the PTAC after its review of the Mount Sinai proposal,” the authors concluded.
Reference
Liao JM, Navathe A, Press MJ. Hospital-at-home care programs—is the hospital of the future at home? JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(8):1040-1041. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2566.
NAACOS Continues Pushing Forward on the Transition to Value-Based Care
September 21st 2020Allison Brennan, MPP, discusses legislation that would affect accountable care organizations (ACOs), the impact coronavirus disease 2019 had on ACOs, and the fall National Association of ACOs meeting.
Listen
Examining Physician-Initiated Alternative Payment Models, a New Wave of Payment Reform
September 12th 2019To date, most alternative payment models (APMs) that have emerged in the shift toward value-based care have been initiated by payers and focused on primary care providers. However, there has recently been a new wave of payment reform in which providers, mostly specialists, are designing and implementing their own APMs in their practices. A study published in the September issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® analyzed some of these new payment models to gain insight into what providers are prioritizing in their APMs.
Listen
Clinical Trials Won’t Cause Financial Harm for Practices in Medicare Payment Models, Study Finds
June 28th 2024Ishwaria Subbiah, MD, of SCRI Oncology Partners, discusses new findings presented at ASCO 2024. This interview will appear in the annual ASCO recap issue of Evidence-Based Oncology.
Read More