Stronger intervention by the government in controlling price, accessibility, and availability of MS treatment can drive innovation, said Aliza Ben-Zacharia, DNP, ANP, associate director at the Center for Nursing Research and Innovation at Mount Sinai.
Stronger intervention by the government in controlling price, accessibility, and availability of MS treatment can drive innovation, said Aliza Ben-Zacharia, DNP, ANP, associate director at the Center for Nursing Research and Innovation at Mount Sinai.
Transcript
Are there any policies that you would like to see enacted that would help improve affordability of MS treatment for the patients you serve?
Absolutely, I think 1 of the policies is the government has to control the price of the medication. That's what you have in European countries and in other countries that you can really develop these new policies and really control the price of the medications. I don't think that pharmaceuticals will provide it for free, and that's not my goal, but I don't think that you can allow anything to be so expensive—the thousands and thousands of dollars of the price of medication, and in some other diseases more than $100,000. I think nobody can really afford these medications, and because of it, some of the insurance policies become more expensive. The main policy is that everyone in the United States with MS should have access to medication and should be treated for their lifetime on medication. If clinician decides that the patient needs a different medication, not the insurance 1; 2, that's another policy that's very painful for me–I will prescribe a medication and then the insurance will give me their whole spiel about tier 1, level 1, level 2, no patient has to be on this, then on this–who gave them the right to make decisions about what medication patients will go on?
They don't have the knowledge, they don't have the expertise, they don't look at the MRI of patients, they don't look at the clinical presentation of patients; but yet, they make a decision about what medication. I think a policy has to be done and developed about these insurance companies. It's so important, and really patients need access to these medications. Either they have a relapsing course or progressive course—children, adult, elderly–everyone should be entitled and given this medication to control their disease. So, I think those 2 policies about access and affordable, but really controlling the price of the medication is number 1. Number 2, making sure that it's available to all patients and really controlling insurance company a bit. Just really, I think the government needs to get involved with insurance companies. They have in the past with pre-existing conditions, which was excellent so everyone can get it; but nowadays, they really have to intervene and create the policy for insurance to not intervene with care of patient–they should not make that decision.
New Insights Into Meth-Associated PAH Care Gaps: Anjali Vaidya, MD, on Closing the Divide
June 4th 2025Research from Anjali Vaidya, MD, FACC, FASE, FACP, Temple University Hospital, reveals critical care gaps for patients with methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and integrated support.
Read More
Laundromats as a New Frontier in Community Health, Medicaid Outreach
May 29th 2025Lindsey Leininger, PhD, and Allister Chang, MPA, highlight the potential of laundromats as accessible, community-based settings to support Medicaid outreach, foster trust, and connect families with essential health and social services.
Listen
Tailored Dosing for MM Matters More Than Drug Count: Ajai Chari, MD
April 25th 2025When it comes to treating multiple myeloma (MM), Ajai Chari, MD, argued that more is not always better. More intense treatment regimens, or those with more drugs, don't necessarily guarantee better outcomes.
Read More
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More