With 36 states utilizing Healthcare.gov, and with at least 2 additional states considering enrollment, the concept of a national healthcare insurance exchange (HIE) may quickly become a reality.
With 36 states utilizing Healthcare.gov, and with at least 2 additional states considering enrollment, the concept of a national healthcare insurance exchange (HIE) may quickly become a reality. This would be converse to the ideals behind the Affordable Care Act, which intended to have each state running its own independent HIE. Many remain worried as to whether the federal government is prepared for such an undertaking.
“We’re kind of, in a way, stumbling into this situation,” said health expert and former Deputy Secretary of HHS Tevi Troy.
The federal exchange option was originally meant to be a safety net for those states that did not build exchanges in time to meet consumer demand, but it is unlikely that many states would have predicted there would be so many challenges in establishing state-run exchanges.
“While [the administration] spent an inordinate amount of time and energy and money encouraging states to run and own their own exchanges, I think that that has kind of shifted,” said Jon Kingsdale, a consultant who worked with the original Massachusetts exchange under former Governor Mitt Romney.
Although CMS said it would continue to work with states in securing their exchanges, many have opted to use the federal exchange in order to resolve growing financial and logistical problems. This decision may eventually affect state legislators if they later change their mind.
“I think forces inside the federal government think the federal government should run this,” said Joel Ario, a consultant with Manatt Health Solutions. “I think those folks are now pushing hard, and if the states aren’t careful, there may be some … motion to make it harder for the states to reclaim their role.”
One solution may be choosing state-federal partnerships, where states could modify federal exchange offerings to suit their particular needs. Several states, including New Hampshire and Michigan, have already taken advantage of such an arrangement.
Around the Web
GOP’s Obamacare Fears Come True [Politico]
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen
Neurologists Share Tips for Securing Patient Access to Gene Therapies
March 19th 2025Tenacious efforts at every level, from the individual clinician to the hospital to the state to Congress, will be needed to make sure patients can access life-saving gene therapies for neuromuscular diseases.
Read More
How Access to SMA Treatment Varies Globally and by Insurance Type
March 18th 2025Posters presented at the 2025 Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) Clinical & Scientific Conference show that therapeutic advances in treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are not uniformly making it into the hands of patients who could benefit.
Read More